logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.06.28 2018가단5095375
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relevant Plaintiff is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to C Passenger Vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”). The relevant Plaintiff is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to D Trucks (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicles”) and the Defendant is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to D Trucks (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicles” in the attached Form 2, from “the level of drug at the scene of the accident” to 13

나. 사고의 발생 (1) 원고차량은 2016. 2. 27. 07:35경 경기 가평군 청평면 경춘로 239 원대성리 삼거리 교차로를 ‘수동’(‘’형 도로 하단) 방면에서 ‘춘천’ 방면[‘’ 부분 도로(춘천↔서울)]으로 신호를 위반하여 적신호에 좌회전을 하였다.

(2) At the time, the upper part of the front part of the driver’s vehicle running along the two-lanes in accordance with the straight-line signal from the Chuncheon bank to the Seoul bank. The front part of the Defendant’s vehicle running along the first two-lanes shocked by the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle running along the second two-lanes.

(별지 ‘사고현장 약도’ 참조. 이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라 한다). (3) 이 사건 사고의 2차 충격 후 원고차량 밖으로 튕겨져 나온 원고차량의 동승자 E와 F는 사망하였고, 원고차량의 운전자 G, 원고차량의 동승자 H, I, J은 부상을 입었다.

C. By December 7, 2018, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,014,825,390,00 in total, with the amount of damage compensation insurance due to the injury of E and F, G, H, I, I, and J.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers for those with serial numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is with the negligence of violating speed limit (in the case of this case, driving at a speed of 60 km/h or 85 km/h) of the Defendant’s vehicle and violating the method of passing designated lanes (in the case of two lanes, driving at a speed of one lane).

arrow