logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.11.23 2017가단24954
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 7, 200, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the deceased B on the building listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant apartment”). On January 26, 2017, the Plaintiff renewed the lease agreement every two years, and entered into a lease agreement with the lessee on January 26, 2017, with a lease deposit of KRW 11,420,00 for the instant apartment, monthly rent of KRW 150,00 for KRW 150,00 for the instant apartment, and two years for the lease term (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). According to the instant lease agreement (Evidence 3), the lessor may renew the lease agreement every two years for the occupancy of the relevant rental house (excluding special contract terms Article 1(1)), and the lessee who acquired the relevant rental house at the time of the lease agreement or the lessee’s eligibility to move into the leased house by fraudulent or other unlawful means (excluding cases where the lessee or the lessee acquired the relevant rental house by entering into a lease agreement in an electronic or other unavoidable manner) and disposes of the relevant house within 6 months after the lease agreement or other lessee’s.

(Article 10(1) of the General Conditions for Contracts. At the time of the conclusion of the above contract, the network B made a written oath that “if it is found as owned by a house as a result of the computerized search on the current status of ownership of a house after maturity, it is not required to raise an objection to the cancellation and eviction of the housing supply contract.” The Defendant and his children C, his children D, and his descendants as a member of the household.

arrow