beta
Text
The judgment below
Of them, the part on Defendant AF shall be reversed.
Defendant
AF is dismissed from the acquittal of Defendant Qua.
Reasons
Summary of Grounds for Appeal
Defendant
Q misunderstanding of facts only collected money from a person who was “BF Morma” before the towing, and it was between the “N cafeteria” located in Daejeon Sung-gu AO, Daejeon, Daejeon, and did not do so at the same place.
The sentence of unfair sentencing (eight months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.
Defendant
Although Defendant AF asked AF to allow AF to go away from the gambling place and asked AF to go to the gambling place, Defendant AF refused to play a role as a butter for the reason that A, a warehouse (a person who solicits people to participate in gambling by opening a gambling place and plays a general control over gambling) was old, Defendant AF refused to play a role as a butter to AF from AP, and there was no fact that Defendant A et al. conspired to open the gambling place with A et al., and there was no fact that A et al. and et al. conspired to open the gambling place.
The sentence of unfair sentencing (10 months of imprisonment) by the court below is too unreasonable.
Judgment
Defendant
The following circumstances acknowledged by the judgment of the court below and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance as to Q Q, namely, ① the prosecutor stated that “AT (this is the name of Defendant Q; hereinafter the same shall apply) was stuffed back to P at the time,” and P also stated that “AT had participated in 4 to 5 times of gambling,” and ② AA stated in the police that “AT was 5 to 6 times of gambling,” and the police stated that “AT was “AT was memoryd as 5 to 6 times of gambling,” and K, I, B, and L stated in the police police that “AT was gambling (a person who gambling money by participating in gambling, i.e., gambling participant)” and ③ Defendant Q was to receive money from the court of first instance to the court of first instance, and at the investigation stage, Defendant Q borrowed money.”