All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Defendant

A and D misunderstanding of facts shall be "the means of access No. 10 means of access No. 10 each year among the attached list of crimes (2)."

There is no fact that the lower court did not transfer the means of access. The lower court’s sentence of unfair sentencing (Defendant A: one year and eight months of imprisonment, and one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable. Defendant B limited liability companies [Defendant B’s misunderstanding of facts (No. 3 per annum, No. 1, No. 2, No. 8, and 9 per annum)] is a corporation under the name of E, E, and the Defendant did not know about the establishment of the said corporation and the transfer of the means of access under the name of the said corporation, and did not participate therein. The lower court did not have any fact that Defendant A and D, which is the principal offender of the 10 means of access, transfer the means of access No. 10, no more than 10,000 won and the remaining crimes: 10,000 won and 10,000 won under the name of the said corporation; 20,000 won and 10,000,000 won under the name of the said corporation. The lower court’s argument that the Defendants were unlawful.

I would like to be issued two means of access to a corporation’s account established under one’s own type V.