A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Forging an official document and uttering of forged official document;

A. On August 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a family relation certificate under the name of the head of the Si/Gun/Gu of Busan Metropolitan City on July 3, 2017 from “D” visiting for change of equipment in the Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City; (b) stored it by means of inserting the personal information of “Ma” on the family matters column of the family relation certificate against the Defendant issued on August 21, 2017; and (c) printed it by means of inserting the personal information of “Ma” on the family matters column of the family relation certificate to the Defendant issued on August 21, 2017; and (d) entered the same in the LG internal system as if the above forged family relation certificate was issued genuinely.

For the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a family relation certificate under the name of the official in charge of computerized operation in the central office of electronic information management, and exercised it to the manager of LG internal system who is aware of the forgery.

B. On December 12, 2017, the Defendant can can carry the family relation certificate submitted by E at the above paragraph (a) above, compiled by means of attaching personal information of “ father F” and “Ma E” in the column of family relation certificate against the Defendant issued by the Defendant on September 20, 2017 using the computer screen program, and then printed out the certificate by means of inserting the personal information of “ father F” and “Ma E”, and then entered the forged family relation certificate in the LG internal system as if the certificate was issued genuinely.

For the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a family relation certificate under the name of the official in charge of computerized operation in the central office of electronic information management, and exercised it to the manager of LG internal system who is aware of the forgery.

2. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. On August 28, 2017, the Defendant opened a cell phone of 60 opon in F’s name without F’s consent in order to raise the performance of the store at the port of port of No. 1, at F around August 28, 2017, and filed an application for service membership and a written consent for the use of personal information in that place.