logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2016.04.28 2016고정30
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a B-car electronic vehicle driving company.

On October 12, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 09:00, and proceeded at a speed of about 40 kilometers per hour from the rith to the rith of the warehouse of the agricultural products at low temperature of the agricultural products at the Dogdo, the Dogin-do, the area of which is located in the Dog, the Dog-gun, the area of which is the Dog-gun, the Dog-do.

However, since there are a central line and there were many vehicles moving, the defendant has a duty of care to avoid operating a vehicle beyond the central line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and took part in the part of the front part of the victim C Driving D Driving, which was proceeding normally in the opposite part due to the negligence going beyond the center line, as a part of the fences on the side of the driver’s seat of the Defendant driving vehicle.

As a result, the defendant suffered injuries, such as cage cage cages at the left side, which require approximately five weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C's written statement related to traffic accidents;

1. Medical certificate (C);

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of the statutes governing the field map of traffic accidents and on-site photographs;

1. Selection of a fine and reduction of the punishment prescribed in the summary order, in consideration of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of a fine (the punishment shall be reduced than that prescribed in the summary order, after taking into account the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim, the defendant has no particular criminal history

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow