A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2018. 4. 9. 10:44 경부터 같은 날 10:52 경까지 사이에 광주 서구 B에 있는 C 주민센터에서 복지업무 상담을 하던 중 자신에게 지급된 복지 품목을 공개하지 않는다는 이유로 그 곳에서 근무 중이 던 공무원인 D에게 소리를 지르고, 공무원인 E으로부터 이를 제지 당하자 화가 나 E에게 “ 야, 이 씹할 놈 아. 건들지 마라. 콱, 개새끼가. 저리 가라, 씹할 놈 아. 그냥.” 이라고 욕설을 하고, 손으로 E의 가슴 부위를 수차례 밀치는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning welfare counseling with civil petitioners.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the CCTV screen to a CCTV image closure;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. There are multiple criminal records that have been punished for the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation, and the liability for the crime committed by many criminal defendants is not easy.

However, in depth, the punishment shall be determined like the order, taking into account the fact that the injured party who has made an agreement with the accused does not want to be punished, that the injured party lives alone as a recipient of basic livelihood security, and that the health is not good.