logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.05 2016가단5261529
사용료
Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 32,335,277 and KRW 32,312,696 among them, from September 6, 2016 to the day of full payment.

Reasons

1. The allegations and judgment of the parties

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(However, ‘creditor' is considered as ‘Plaintiff' and ‘debtor' as ‘Defendant'). 【No dispute exists, the entry of evidence Nos. 1 and 3 and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. As to this, the Defendant alleged to the effect that the Plaintiff cannot accept the Plaintiff’s claim, since the Defendant used the instant leased vehicle to B, not the Defendant, and thus, requested B to succeed to the instant lease agreement. However, such circumstance alone alone does not deny liability under the instant lease agreement, and the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable since the leased vehicle was not returned until the closing date of the argument in the instant case.

2. According to the conclusion, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the money stated in the Disposition No. 1.

arrow