Defendant

In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent for attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of imprisonment (three years of imprisonment) imposed by the Defendant and the person to whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter “defendants”) shall be too unreasonable.

B. Prosecutor 1) The above sentence imposed by the lower court on the ground that the above sentence is too uneasible and unfair. 2) The lower court’s dismissal of the request for attachment order is unjust, since the Defendant’s dismissal of the attachment order is recognized as a risk of

2. Determination

A. The part of the defendant's case: evidence on the argument of unfair sentencing between the parties, evidence rules and legal principles, the crime of this case acknowledged by the defendant's act of rape or indecent act against the female victims living alone during the new wall time, and the defendant's act of stealing his clothes by intrusion upon the female victims' residence, and thus, the crime is very bad, and the crime is very bad, and there are no risks. In particular, the crime of rape and bodily harm against the victim F committed by the victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's sexual shock or sexual humiliation is very broad, and the contents and methods of the crime are very broad, and interview are very broad, and the victim's victim's criminal act appears to have suffered considerable physical and mental shock or suffered sexual humiliation, and the victim's victim's victim's victim's D, L,O, Q did not agree or was not made.

However, the fact that the defendant has committed all crimes, the degree of injury suffered by the victim F of the crime of rape and injury is not serious, the defendant's monetary value of stolen clothes is not excessive, and some of the victims have been returned to the victims, the victims have not want to be punished against the defendant by agreement with the F. and C, and the year 2010.