The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the court below rendered is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the crime related to narcotics is not easy to detect in light of its characteristics; (b) the risk of recidivism is high; and (c) the negative impact of the society on the whole due to the crypology, toxicity, etc. is significant; (d) the Defendant has been punished once by sentence due to the commission of penphones, X-type medication, or marijuana smoking; and (e) the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes despite the period of repeated crime; (c) the Defendant has committed the instant crime despite the repeated crime; (d) the Defendant recommended the women first faced with marijuana to smoke marijuana at the same time; and (e) other various circumstances, including the Defendant’s character and behavior, environment, motive, process, means and method of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the argument and the record of the instant case, even if the Defendant appears to have committed the crime in favor of the Defendant, it is not deemed unfair due to excessive punishment imposed by

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.