A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

From March 2016 to May 2017, the Defendant claimed refund of medical expenses by asserting that the aforementioned hospital did not comply with each other after receiving a crypt treatment from the Section Section operated by the victim B (5) from around March 2016 to after approximately one year and eight months after receiving a crypt treatment, the Defendant demanded refund of medical expenses, but the victim demanded payment of 2 million won for unpaid medical expenses, thereby causing the victim to suffer a malicious appraisal.

The Defendant is entitled to compensate for franchis performed by the Defendant at the front entrance of the first floor of the building of Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, almost every day except for weekends from November 22, 2019 to January 14, 2020.

The 1-person demonstration was carried out by putting inket the so-called "diet that does not have food and does not have to be other hospitals" while leaving the gympis.

As above, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s hospital by deceptive means, and damaged the honor of the victim by publicly pointing out facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's written statement of the police investigation report (verification of the suspect's condition) on the defendant's partial statement B (X-rain photographs, diagnosis and treatment records, CCTV images, etc.) and related photographs (as the defendant conducted a demonstration with a true fact, it is alleged that the crime of defamation by the statement of false facts is not committed, and as long as the part of defamation by the statement of false facts is acquitted as it is acknowledged as the crime of defamation by the statement of false facts, it is acknowledged that the above assertion is unlawful, even if the defendant's above assertion is decided to the effect that the illegality is denied, it is difficult to view that the illegality of the above crime of the defendant is dismissed in light of the period and method of demonstration by the defendant's pocket, the necessity and legitimacy of

1. Articles 314 (1) and 313 of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a fine for elective punishment under Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act among the ordinary concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70 of the Criminal Act for the Detention of Labor House Head.