logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.02.27 2018고단292
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person of "2018 Highest 292" shall transfer or acquire any means of access for electronic financial transactions.

Nevertheless, around September 5, 2017, the Defendant, through a mobile phone, sent a cell phone call to the effect that “A person in charge of a logistics company that imports raw materials from overseas, who is a person in charge of a logistics company B, and another person’s account is needed to receive customs benefits. If the Defendant sent a check card and the account number and password are notified, he would be paid KRW 3 million per month per account.”

Defendant for the same year

9. At around 15.15. In the street near Sung-gun's Sung-gun's Sung-gun's Sung-gun's Sung-gun's Sung-gun's Sung-gun, the method of electronic financial transaction was sent through Kwikkset service to the Cbank's D account in the name of the defendant and by informing the password of the above C Card by telephone.

Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the means of access to electronic financial transactions.

"2019 Highest 333" Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the credit amount even if the goods are purchased on credit because the credit amount, including the credit card price, was 13 million won.

Nevertheless, on July 19, 2018, the Defendant want to have a 50,000 won of '50,000 won of '50,000 won of '50,000 won' from G of the victim F's operation of the Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, and there is no need to deposit the remaining 9,50,000 won into the head of the Tong by the

‘Falsely speaking to the effect that it is ‘the victim’s market price was 1,000,000 won or more at the victim’s market price.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 292"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. The details of transactions and details of transactions from entry and withdrawal "2019No33";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and I.

arrow