The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.2 million won.

If the above fine is not paid.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable as a sentence of a judgment of the court of first instance (a fine of KRW 900,000) is too unfilled;

2. The following circumstances revealed in the records of this case and the first instance court and the party hearing, namely, from 195 to 2002, the Defendant served as a member of the City Council, and the third and fourth local elections were run nationwide. At the time of the instant crime, the Defendant appears to have been in office as a member of the City Council at the time of the instant crime, and the Defendant had been sentenced to a fine for violating the Election Act and the Prevention of Election Illegal Acts and subordinate statutes or the Public Official Election Act two times prior to the occurrence of the past record; the Defendant received “the National Assembly of Dong-si Local Political Relations Act (hereinafter referred to as the “National Election Commission of June 4, 2014”),” which was distributed to the preliminary candidates, “the publication of similar academic background or non-regular academic background, such as the instant crime, included the contents that the publication of the list of preliminary candidates for the National Assembly members,” “a political party presentation session for the National Assembly guidance room of 3:00 on February 14, 2014.”

5. 1. 1. 14:00: (a) at the same place, the Defendant held an explanatory meeting for candidates to educate the Defendant that the publication of the non-regular academic background was illegal; (b) at that time, the Defendant attended the explanatory meeting (the Defendant stated that he did not attend the explanatory meeting before the public prosecutor and sent his proxy, but the Defendant was the person who was present at the time of the initial investigation by the election commission C), and the name of printed and distributed the non-regular academic background is not less than 4,00,000, and as such, the Defendant did not have any influence on the result of the election, even though he was able to run for a non-affiliated office, as the Defendant was dissatisfyd by 40

It is difficult to conclude that the defendant has failed to exercise influence, and the defendant's defense counsel at the trial of the next 70 local elections in the following city local elections.