logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.01.16 2017고단3298
절도등
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,00.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C is the real representative of D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as D), and Defendant B is the business director of D and Defendant A is the head of the Ministry of Justice of D.

G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “G”) which is a contractor at the construction site of the E-building apartment (hereinafter referred to as “instant construction”) located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, promoted by the E-Building Association, subcontracted the entire remainder of the instant construction project to D on February 2014 while performing the instant construction project. While the construction is discontinued, D had all number of persons to be terminated at the site of the instant construction project.

Accordingly, the members of the said reconstruction association and the management director of G start up the completion construction work according to the agreement between the said reconstruction association and H, and the members of the said reconstruction association agreed to occupy the construction site of this case without permission by asserting a lien on the completion of the construction site of this case, in order to facilitate the use of D’s claim for the construction cost related to the instant construction project, the Defendants, as above, had received the iron at the construction site, but some of the parts of the construction works remain at the construction site.

1. On February 17, 2016, the Defendants interfering with their duties: (a) around 06:00, at the instant construction site; (b) Defendant C, etc., through the executive conference, instructed Defendant B, etc. to occupy the instant construction site without permission; and (c) Defendant B employed 20 employees as daily workers; (d) Defendant B and A prevented the daily workers from having access to the instant construction site by preventing them from having access to the instant construction site; and (e) by having other visitors enter the building site and alter the locking system of the building used in G from the instant construction site to the office; and (e) around that time, Defendant B and A drafted the remaining construction site of the instant construction site, such as H and G chief J, K in the site, and the on-site leader L.

arrow