logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.08.18 2017고단1130
교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-Scar.

1. On January 24, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.084% from the 5km section of the blood alcohol level to the shooting distance at the entrance of the mountain mountain of the same 2033-16, located in the front side of the Gando Office located in the Sinan-Eup of the Dong-dong at Jeju-si on January 24, 2017, when the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.084% of alcohol level in the blood.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Death, etc.) led the Defendant to drive the said car under the influence of alcohol as above at the time of the day set forth in the preceding paragraph and drive it along the two-lanes between the two-lanes of the two-lanes at the front of the private-distance road at the entrance of the Dompo-si in Jeju Special Metropolitan City, which is located in the 2033-16 Simpo-si.

At all times, a crosswalk was installed in the front, and in such a case, it is a road with a speed of 60 km a speed of 60 km a speed. In such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to ensure the safety of driving by complying with the speed limit, and to reduce the speed in front of the crosswalk and by properly examining the right and the right and the right of the crosswalk.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim D(W, 26 years old) who dried the crosswalk on the right side of the defendant's running direction when he was negligent in driving about about 86.7 km per hour while under the influence of alcohol, and did not discover the victim D(W, 26 years old) and received the part of the victim's right side part in front of the said car.

After all, the defendant caused the victim's death by negligence in the above business, which caused the death of the victim from the back to the back to the back to the back to the back.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A survey report, an on-site photo (4) of an accident, an on-site photo, etc. (the net time 18);

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking and statement in the circumstances of the driver of drinking;

1. Corpses, photographs of victims, etc.;

1. The Acts and subordinate statutes of the comprehensive analysis of traffic accidents;

arrow