logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2014.06.11 2014고단155
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged of this case is that "the employee of the defendant violated the restriction on vehicle operation on the roads front of the subordinate drown Office on April 1, 1994 with respect to the defendant's business."

However, since Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995), which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged, are effective under Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the same Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995), the Constitutional Court Order 201Hun-Ga24 of Dec. 29, 201 and the proviso of Article 47 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act, are retroactively lost, and thus,

arrow