beta
Text
All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
Summary of Grounds for Appeal
A. Defendant 1) There is no fact that there was an injury to the victim by mistake of facts. 2) The sentence of the lower court on unreasonable sentencing (2 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.
B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant may recognize the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by assaulting the victim’s face by keeping the victim’s body closely and spoping spoping, etc. as stated in the facts charged, and therefore, this part of the Defendant’s assertion is
The victim made a relatively consistent statement on the main part of the facts charged that the victim abusedd and injured the victim in the investigative agency and the court of original instance.
It cannot be said that the credibility of a statement is nonexistent on the ground that the victim is not aware of the specific method of the assault or the incidental situation at the time of occurrence of the case.
B. At the court of the court below, the witness made a statement consistent with the facts charged that “the defendant was sprinking the victim with the victim on the day of the instant case, was sponsing him, was flicking him, was flicking his face in the process, and the victim’s face was flicked, and the victim’s face was flicked.”
C. The Defendant also stated to the effect that “the victim’s face has been scophned or scophing at one time at the floor of hand,” from the investigative agency to the court of the trial. The Defendant also stated to the effect that “the Defendant’s defense counsel also submitted a written opinion (see, e.g., see, e., the trial record) to the effect that “the Defendant’s body was scophn by hand
In full view of witness statements and the above statements of the defendant, the court below is one of the original facts charged by the prosecutor.