1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The plaintiff's assertion committed several assaults on the left side of the plaintiff, and the defendant is obligated to pay 9,653,200 won including the amount of damages equivalent to the medical expenses incurred to the plaintiff due to such unlawful act and the amount of solatium 2,170,000, and damages for delay.

2. Determination

A. According to the purport of the evidence No. 1 and the entire pleadings as to the occurrence of damage liability No. 1, the Defendant, around October 29, 2016, was able to recognize that the Defendant committed an assault against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant assault”), while engaging in a dispute with the Plaintiff’s vision attached to the Plaintiff on October 29, 2016, and during that process, the Defendant committed an assault against the Plaintiff.

According to the above facts, the assault of this case constitutes intentional tort, and the defendant is obligated to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the assault of this case.

나. 손해배상책임의 범위 1) 적극적 손해 가) 원고는 이 사건 폭행으로 인하여 34번 치아가 파절되어 틀니제작비용 6,883,900원, 치과 상해진단서 발급비용 및 진료비 322,900원을 지출하였고, 좌안(左顔) 및 안구에 상해가 발생하여 안과 진료 및 치료비용 30,200원, 정형외과 진료비용 4,300원을 지출하였으며, 이 사건 폭행으로 인한 심리적 트라우마로 정신과 치료를 받아서 신경정신과 진료 및 치료비용 141,900원을 지출하였고, 그 외에 녹취록 비용으로 100,000원을 지출하여 합계 7,483,200원의 적극적 손해가 발생하였다고 주장한다.

B. First of all, the number of evidence Nos. 1 and 2 as shown in this part of the Plaintiff’s assertion is as follows. The number of evidence Nos. 1 and 2 as shown in the Plaintiff’s argument is as of April 12, 2017, respectively.

5. The above evidence was prepared on 22. 6 to 7 months after the date of the instant assault, and the “the cause of injury” as stated in the above evidence was merely the movement of the Plaintiff’s statement. Thus, the above evidence alone constitutes the instant assault.