Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant became aware of F engaged in the same industry while operating “E real estate” in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu.

On March 2014, the Defendant had been aware of the fact in E’s real estate around March 2014.

G knew that it is intended to obtain a loan as security for H real estate in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the G introduced the above F to the above G.

Although a loan broker, a loan solicitor, and a unregistered loan broker are not to receive a loan from a trading partner who receives a loan in connection with loan brokerage regardless of the name, such as a fee, honorarium, or advance payment, the defendant and the F used the work cost received from the above G only purely, and the last 50 to 50 to 50 to 50 to 50.

1. Around March 15, 2014, Incheon H H real estate loan-related F would allow the above G, a counter-party to the transaction that was loaned by the Defendant through the Defendant in the above E real estate, to obtain a loan to the said G with respect to the said H real estate.

“” refers to the purport of “a loan work expense” and received KRW 20 million from the said G to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant on March 17, 2014 under the pretext of the commencement of the loan.

2. The above F related to I real estate loans in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the end of March 2014, knowing that the above G wants to sell its residence at the G’s residence in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, I will receive the loans to the maximum extent possible because the transaction could be made because the actual amount of investment made by the purchaser would be less than the actual amount of investment if the real estate loans are received as security.

“.” The purport of the foregoing E is that the Defendant demanded the above G from the above E real estate to pay KRW 30 million as loan work expenses, and the Defendant was transferred KRW 30 million from the above G to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant on April 4, 2014 as loan work expenses.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspireds with the above F twice from the trading partner G.