1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The facts under the following basic facts are remarkable or obvious in records to this court:

On April 6, 2015, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit against the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff by assaulting the Plaintiff, claiming for the payment of KRW 3,215,108 for damages, and damages for delay thereof, with the Seoul Northern District Court, and the said court rendered a decision to transfer the said case to the Seoul Northern District Court on July 9, 2015.

B. On July 30, 2015, the court of the first instance, upon which the instant case was transferred, served the copy of the complaint and the litigation guide to Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant’s domicile, and the Defendant directly received the copy of the complaint and the litigation guide at the above address on July 31, 2015.

C. The court of first instance concluded the pleading by opening the first date for pleading on October 4, 2015, after delivering a notice of the date for pleading to the Defendant on October 26, 2015, when the notice of the date for pleading was served to the Defendant as the address, but was not served due to the absence of a closed door.

On November 19, 2015, the court of first instance rendered a judgment citing the Plaintiff’s claim on December 2, 2015, after delivering the notice of the sentencing date to the Defendant to the above address, but also is not served due to the absence of a closed door.

On December 18, 2015, the court of first instance served the original of the judgment as the above address but was not served as a director's unknown, and served the original of the judgment by means of service by public notice in accordance with the order of the presiding judge of the first instance court to serve by public notice, and on January 50, 2016, the service became effective at the time of January 5, 2016.

On March 7, 2016, the Defendant submitted the instant written appeal for subsequent completion to the expiration of 14 days from the date of arrival of the original copy of the said judgment.

2. Determination as to the legitimacy of the subsequent appeal of this case

A. As long as the original copy of the judgment was served by the method of service by public notice by order of the presiding judge ex officio, the requirements are not satisfied.

(b) if any;