All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court's sentence (2 years of suspended sentence in June, 2 years of suspended sentence in Defendant A, 2 years of suspended sentence in August, and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

The basic area of sentencing guidelines [the scope of punishment by law] 5 years or less [the scope of punishment by law] 2 years or less [the scope of punishment by recommendation] among the group of illegal game water crimes [the scope of punishment by exchange, intermediation of exchange, and repurchase] : The basic area of punishment by imprisonment: From June to June, the defendants are against the defendants. However, the crimes of this case are likely to be against the defendants, such as promoting the gambling spirit of the people and impairing their sound labor awareness. The crimes of this case are focused on the degree of participation in the crime. Defendant B also contributed essential and important to the crime by allowing the defendant to operate the game place under his own name; Defendant A also contributed to the essential and important contribution to the crime; Defendant A is within the scope of sentence recommended by the sentencing guidelines; and other various circumstances that are the conditions of sentencing as recorded in the records and arguments. Thus, the defendants' assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendants' appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.