logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.13 2018고정1297
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 1, 2016, the Defendant is required to leave the victim E in the D convalescent hospital located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim E is required to have a large amount of time when his or her husband’s wife flag with his or her mother flag in his or her ceiling.

In this regard, it has not yet been able to apply for a loan as security.

The loan shall be repaid immediately as from November 15 to November 27, because the loan is financed within the scope of the loan.

The term “one thousand to five hundred to twenty million won loan” was false as high-term payments.

However, at the time, the Defendant was in arrears with the amount of KRW 10 million, and the credit card transaction was suspended, and due to the circumstances in which the Defendant was unable to repay the amount of KRW 4 million borrowed from the beneficiary, the Defendant intended to use the money to repay the credit card price, etc. from the victim, and was unable to pay the borrowed amount properly.

As such, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received KRW 5 million from the victim’s victim; (c) received the victim’s credit card from the victim on the same day; (d) withdrawn KRW 1,400,000 from the cash service; and (e) received the victim’s credit card from the victim on November 2, 2016, remitted KRW 1,600,000 to the flood bank account under the name of the Defendant; and (c) withdrawn KRW 1,40,000 from the victim’s credit card to the cash service in the said D convalescent on the same day.

2. On November 7, 2016, the Defendant purchased the Defendant’s satisfy to the Defendant at the D convalescent Hospital listed in paragraph (1).

How much money may be lent; and

The phrase "a loan of KRW 2,00,000 has been changed," and the phrase was false.

However, the defendant was unable to pay the borrowed money properly to the victim on the grounds of Paragraph 1.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was transferred from the damaged party to the flood control account under the name of the Defendant.

3. 피고인은 2016. 11. 21. 제 1 항 기재 D 요양병원에서 피해자에게 “ 돈이 모자라서 고기를 아직 다 못 샀다.

The loan has not yet been established, and the loan has also been extended.

arrow