logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.06.09 2016고단687
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. A summary of the facts charged is a person who drives a C5 tons truck, and the Defendant Company is a corporation established for the purpose of trucking transport business.

B on December 7, 2007, 11:11 on Pyeongtaek-si, Cheongbuk-do, 2007.

L. 204-1 L. L. 204-1, L. 2.8 km, L.W., L. L. 204-1, L. L. L. 2, L.W. L. 2, L.W. 2, L.W. 1.87 tons L.W., L.W., L.W., L. 2, L.W., L.W., L.W., L.W., L., L.W., L., L.W., L., L.W., L.W., L.W., L.

2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005 and wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008), which provided the basis of the punishment of this case, "in case where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the relevant Article shall also be imposed on the corporation," which provides that "in the event that the agent, employee or other worker of the corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the relevant Article shall also be imposed on the corporation," which provides the basis of the punishment of this case, has become retroactively null and void by the Constitutional Court's decision of 17

arrow