beta
Text
Defendant
A As to the crimes set forth in Article 2015-Ma1238 of the Decision, the crime is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four years, and Article 2015-Ma1581 of the Decision.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 4, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months for special larceny, etc. in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on September 4, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 12, 2013.
Defendant
D On May 14, 2015, the Incheon District Court sentenced 2 years of suspension of the execution to 6 months of imprisonment for violating the Military Service Act at the Incheon District Court, which became final and conclusive on May 22, 2013.
Criminal facts
[Attachment 2015 Highest 1238] In the case of a telecommunications-based financial fraud (hereinafter referred to as “scam”) organization with a Chinese base, the Defendants play part in their respective roles in the form of an organization by deceiving or inducing victims by means of threatening victims as if they were to spread them, such as deceiving the victims or inducing them to take obscene measures by misrepresenting the employees of financial institutions, etc. using a mobile phone or the Internet, etc., the organization is composed of a “China General Liability” and “Korean General Liability” in which the organization manages the organization, and a mobile phone or the Internet, and by inducing them to spread them. The organization is engaged in activities by sharing the roles of each organization in accordance with the instructions of the “China General Liability” in accordance with the direction of the “China Liability”.
In the way of receiving money from victims, it is to induce the victims to enter a false information or unlawful order into a computer and other data processing device by inducing them to enter a false information or an unlawful order into a computer and other data processing device in a way of withdrawing deposits, and induce them to get a malicious code while carrying out a video call with a cell phone, which pretends that the goods are sold, “the ice fraud of goods sales,” “the ice fraud,” “the ice fraud,” “the ice fraud,” “the ice fraud,” “the ice fraud,” “the ice fraud,” “the ice fraud,” “the ice code,” and “the ice code,” which pretends to receive the loans.