logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2013.10.02 2013고정220
산림자원의조성및관리에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, in collusion with C, cut approximately KRW 144,00,000 from approximately 1,820 m2,00,000,000,000,000 by using machinery saws, etc., without obtaining permission from the competent authority, and cutting down approximately 20,000 m20,000,000,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of C, E, and F;

1. Each police statement made to G, H and I;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A list of records on treatment of civil petitions;

1. Permission to fell standing trees;

1. Statement of permission for felling standing timber;

1. A license for felling standing trees;

1. On-site investigation application for permission for felling standing timber;

1. An application for permission to cut standing trees;

1. A survey report on the estimated quantity of deforestation;

1. A certified copy of the register;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of 2008 to the standing timber collection permission ledger;

1. Article 74 (1) 3 and Article 36 (1) of the Creation and Management of Forestry Resources Act and Articles 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The gist of the allegation is that there was no conspiracy with C, nor instruct C to cut down trees in an area where the permission for cutting down was not obtained.

(2) The defendant, in principle, knew that the license tax was granted to the applicant for the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly completed the investigation in the judgment of the court, i.e., that the license tax was granted to the applicant, as well as that the defendant was aware that the defendant was aware that the permission for felling was granted only 4.9 p.m. of the entire budget-gun Nam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, which is its own mountainous district and the permission for cutting down only 4.9 p.m. of the total amount of 18 p.m., if the defendant had a duty to maintain 20m of the width of 5 times or more through telephone communications with E, as the defendant had a duty to maintain 20m of the width of 5 times or more through telephone communications with E.

arrow