logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.05.12 2016가단39682
자동차소유권이전등록절차인수 등
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the instant lawsuit’s claim for the acquisition of the liability to pay fines and taxes shall be dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. The facts subsequent to the fact-finding may be acknowledged either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of all pleadings as a result of the fact-finding inquiry into the South-Korea Market and the Chief of South-Korea Coast Guard in this court, or in the statement No. 1

A. On May 29, 2007, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership of a motor vehicle listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant motor vehicle”).

B. C borrowed KRW 15 million from D on August 8, 2007, and C provided the instant vehicle on behalf of the Plaintiff as security on behalf of the Plaintiff.

C. The instant motor vehicle accident occurred around 18:40 on March 6, 2009 and around 23:00 on March 20, 2009, and the driver was the Defendant.

On October 25, 2012, the instant car number plate was kept in custody on the grounds of the delinquency in payment of the instant automobile tax, and the Defendant recovered the instant car number plate on the same day.

E. The Defendant concluded an automobile insurance contract in the name of the Plaintiff at the time of operating the instant automobile.

2. Determination on application for confirmation of liability for payment, including automobile tax and administrative fine

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion asserts that the Defendant did not register the transfer of ownership after the transfer of the instant vehicle, and that the Plaintiff, a registered titleholder, imposed the tax and public charges, such as the fine for negligence and the automobile tax, etc., and that the Plaintiff

B. We examine ex officio the legitimacy of this part of the lawsuit ex officio.

In addition to the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s obligation to settle fines for negligence, taxes and public charges, etc., the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s obligation to pay fines for negligence, etc., even if the Plaintiff and the Defendant were to be liable to pay the fines for negligence through a lawsuit between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, such judgment’s validity does not naturally affect the taxation authority, not necessarily a party to this lawsuit. Thus, the Plaintiff

or the plaintiff's obligation to pay is extinguished.

arrow