A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

1. No trucking business operator who violates the trucking transport business Act shall exchange illegal money with an automobile management business operator in connection with the transport of cargo, such as a breakdown or accident vehicle;

Despite the fact that the Defendant, as a trucking business operator operating D’s trucking business, did not receive at least 51,600 won of the statutory fee per unit when towing an accident vehicle, the Defendant agreed to receive at least 20% of the monthly official fee from a G industrial company operated by F in Namyang-si on May 2012, to receive at least 20% of the monthly official fee from the above industrial company as a so-called “ through value” in return for taking the accident vehicle into the above industrial company. From July 4, 2012 to November 3, 2015, the Defendant received the so-called “ through value” from the Defendant’s mother-si company company account (L) in the name of the Defendant and the M bank account (N) account in the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 468,438,38,38,38, Mar. 28, 201, respectively.

2. On February 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim R(38 years) who was aware of the details of damage to Q that was injured, as set forth in paragraph (4), within the scope of P shop located in P shop in Nam-si, Nam-si, Nam-si; (b) expressed that “I am superior to, and satched, satched, satched, sat, satched,” and that I am the victim’s face and surrounding areas at the above P shop around 23:10 on the same day; and (c) expressed the victim’s desire to “I am dead” as a matter of treatment expenses for the victim and Q at the victim’s public parking lot; and (d) expressed the victim’s desire to assault twice in the victim’s face and surrounding areas.

3. Magion;

A. A. (1) On August 4, 2014, the Defendant called the victim’s phone prior to the building in Namyang-si around 23:00 on August 4, 2014, the Defendant unilaterally cut off the phone by saying, “The Defendant would have done so, instead of the drinking value, the Defendant would have done so.”

The defendant, at the same place as 24:00 on the same day, stated that "the President had been paid to the victim who received and arrived at the above phone."