logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.25 2014구합4186
부당해고구제재심신청기각판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “the Intervenor”) is a government-funded research institute that mainly employs more than 125 full-time workers from 125 to 700 workers, and mainly conducts research in the field of life science. The Plaintiff is a person who was employed as a researcher from January 18, 2006 to November 2008, and served as the Intervenor B from March 201 to May 28, 2013.

B. The Plaintiff, while serving as B, did not receive reagents from C and D over 205 times from February 28, 2007 to August 6, 2012, the Plaintiff paid KRW 59,739,658 to C, etc. a false acceptance certificate, thereby causing property damage equivalent to the trial price. ② The Plaintiff, upon deceiving the Intervenor’s person in charge as requested by E, had the person in charge claim the fee from the Korea Industry-Academia-Research and Development Association, had the said person in charge claim for the fee from the Korea Industry-Academia-Research and Development Association, and the Daejeon District Prosecutors’ Office, from around September 2012 to around August 6, 2012, detained the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff were detained on the Plaintiff’s temporary retirement on December 27, 2012.

3) On April 26, 2013, Daejeon District Court (2012Gohap734) sentenced the Plaintiff to imprisonment for two years and six months with prison labor for the above criminal facts. On April 29, 2013, the Plaintiff appealed against this order and appealed on April 29, 2013. 4) On May 20, 2013, the Intervenor sent to the Plaintiff, who was confined to the Daejeon Correctional Institution, a written notice of attendance of the personnel committee stating that “the Plaintiff would be asked to make a written statement as to May 24, 2013,” which was returned later.

5) On May 24, 2013, the Intervenor Personnel Committee held a disciplinary committee against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the Intervenor Personnel Committee”).

arrow