Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:50 on July 29, 2014, the Defendant voluntarily frighted with others on charges of assault, and when the Defendant’s daily behaviors were frightened with others, and returned to the Republic of Korea upon mutual agreement, the Defendant notified the Defendant that he will look at the case of assault by mutual agreement among the guards belonging to the Gyeonggi Japan Police Station C district unit in the Gyeonggi-do, Busan Police Station, and the Defendant sent the Defendant to the outside of the C district, and provided the Defendant with a defect that “I am, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, S, E, F, S, S, etc. I am for the victim’s face slope of the victim F, who belongs to the same district, and frighten the Defendant’s chest to treat the Defendant’s chest, such as being frightd with the victim’s face, fright, frighting, and drinking the Defendant’s chest.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the police officer's investigation of crimes and legitimate execution of duties on earth's duty, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Two copies of a medical opinion;

1. Application of four on-site photographs of the statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentence was imposed in consideration of the following: (a) the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) and the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties; (b) the need for strict punishment is very heavy; (c) the degree of injury is not very serious; (d) the Defendant’s mistake is divided and reflected; and (e) there is no past criminal penalty power.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.