Text
1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit after the appeal are filed by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).
Reasons
1. On March 16, 2013, the Defendant discovered a two-lane road in front of the riverside oil station, which is located in the Yanyang-si-si, Yanyang-si (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) by driving the JJ on March 16, 2013 and driving the vehicle into two-lane (hereinafter “the instant offland”). However, the Defendant: (a) discovered a two-lane road in front of the riverside oil station, which is located in the Yanyang-si, Yan-si; (b) driven by the central line on the opposite side of the K (1924 G) (hereinafter “the instant offland”); and (c) avoided the collision between the left side of the said vehicle and the part on the right side of the Yan-si (hereinafter “the instant accident”).
On October 21, 2013, after the filing of the instant lawsuit, K (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) died of resistant pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary dye due to the instant accident.
The plaintiff and the designated parties are children of the deceased.
(C) The deceased’s spouse, the deceased’s spouse, died on May 1, 2014, while the instant lawsuit was pending) [The grounds for recognition - Facts that there is no dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, Eul’s evidence No. 2, Eul’s evidence No. 5-3 through No. 5-9, the purport of the entire pleadings]
2. Determination as to the claim
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 of the parties had the left turn at the center line where the left turn or U-turns can turn to the left at the place of residence from the Tri-type distance located at the place where the instant accident occurred. The Defendant discovered that the left turn to the left at the front of about 50 meters prior to the point where the instant accident occurred.
However, the defendant has prevented the course of the deceased by continuously driving his/her speed without fulfilling his/her duty of care, such as reducing speed or immediately suspending it.
In addition, the defendant who found the Oral Ba of this case shall normally operate the Oral Ba of this case.