A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 10, 2014, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million from the Suwon District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and KRW 5 million from the Suwon District Court on June 24, 2015 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On May 7, 2020, at around 03:48, the Defendant driven a f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the state of state of drinking drivers, and notification of the results of the regulation of drinking driving;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, reply reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of the same kind of power);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include the fact that the defendant was punished twice by a fine for the violation of the Road Traffic Act, the driving of the instant drinking, the fact that the blood alcohol concentration in the instant case is considerably high, and the defendant recognized the crime, etc. shall be determined as the same as the disposition.