logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2014.05.28 2013고정242
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendants are customers of a restaurant with the mutual name of “E” operated by the victim D, and the victim F (V, 42 years of age) is also customers of the same restaurant.

1. The Defendants violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) committed a disturbance by drinking in E-cafeteria located in Chungcheongnam-si G from around 13:00 to 14:05 on May 4, 2013.

Accordingly, he listened to the horses from the victim F, and heard the horses, while the Defendant “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, with the hand floor of the above victim’s face at one time, and Defendant B am, together with the above victim’s hand, and threatened the above victim with drinking and drinking.

The Defendants jointly assaulted the above victims and caused the victims to suffer injuries, such as dives, dives, salt, etc., in need of two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendants interfered with the duties of the Defendants: (a) asked the drinking alcohol at the time and place as described in paragraph (1); and (b) during the height of their words, the victim D, the owner of the business, demanded the drinking alcohol without giving the alcohol, thereby interfering with the instant victim’s restaurant business by force, on the ground that the victim D, who was the owner of the business, demanded the drinking alcohol to do so; and (c) talking with the customers in the same restaurant for about one hour; (d) talking with the customers in the same restaurant; and (e) allowing them to take food at the restaurant; and (e) allowing them to return to the incoming customers, thereby interfering with the instant victim’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. In light of the fact that the witness F, D’s victim F, D’s each statutory statement, D’s statement from an investigative agency to this court, and the contents of the victim F’s injury diagnosis statement are consistent with the facts of injury, etc., the Defendants committed each crime of the crime committed by the Defendants.

arrow