1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. A. A) On September 20, 2009, the Plaintiff: (a) around September 20, 2009, the Defendant was engaged in household wholesale and retail business by expanding the place of business from May 10, 2013 to Daegu Dong-gu B; (b) the trade name was “C”; (c) the type of business was designated as “do retail and retail business (type of business: household, e-commerce)”; and (d) the Plaintiff was engaged in household wholesale and retail business after having registered the business as “Do retail and retail business.”

(3) The Plaintiff filed an annual comprehensive income tax return with the Defendant from 2013 to 2015. (b) The Daegu Director of the Regional Tax Office from April 21, 2017 to 2017

6. By December 23, 200, an individual tax investigation was conducted with respect to the Plaintiff.

As a result, from 2013 to 2015, the plaintiff was confirmed to have omitted the report on the amount of income related to the business of this case by receiving the sales payment from the bank account in the name of F and G, who is his father and son, from the bank account.

2) On August 2017, the commissioner of the Daegu Regional Tax Office notified the Defendant of the taxation data on the sales omitted, and filed a complaint with the Plaintiff on the charge of violating the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act at the Daegu District Prosecutors’ Office. C) On August 3, 2017, the Defendant issued a revised notice of each of the total value-added tax amount of KRW 248,789,180 from 2012 to 2016 and the total of KRW 477,619,920 from 2012 to 2015 (including additional tax), including the global income tax of KRW 103,072,060 for the year 2013, global income tax of KRW 160,870,390 for the year 2014, global income tax of KRW 160,390 for the year 2014, KRW 160 for the year 2015 (including additional tax).

(d) On October 27, 2017, the Plaintiff was dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for a trial with the Tax Tribunal on October 27, 2017, but the said request for a trial was dismissed on February 21, 2018. The Plaintiff did not have any dispute over the grounds for recognition.