logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2018.10.16 2018고단94 (1)
사인부정사용등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On October 10, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud at the support of the Southern District Court of the Jeonju on the last two years and six months, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 26, 2018.

[2] On November 21, 2016, the Defendant was indicted for a crime of fraud in support of the Jeonju District Court (hereinafter “E”) around November 21, 201, under the pretext of investment in apartment project of apartment projects of the D Regional Housing Association (hereinafter “E”), and was sentenced to the same punishment as stated in the above crime records. The Defendant was appointed as the representative director E, but retired from the office of the representative director around November 23, 2016.

When the defendant was judged that the agreement cannot be received from the first instance trial (Seoul District Court 2016 High Court 2016 High Court 2016 High Court 233) on January 201, 2017 when the defendant was pending, and from the first instance trial (the first instance trial court 2016 High Court 201 High Court 203 High Court ) on the case, F already resigned from the representative director as E's former representative director, and F proposed to prepare the agreement and the written application with the knowledge that he did not have the authority to prepare the agreement in the name of E representative director, and F accepted it for the purpose of receiving the agreement from the defendant

Accordingly, on January 6, 2017, F was in possession of at the time, with knowledge of the fact that the defendant would submit to the court the I certified judicial scrivener office located in Gwangju Dong-gu H in order to use it in favor of the judgment of the above fraud case.

The E representative director’s employees employed without authority and affixed written agreements and written applications to the Defendant, and the Defendant knew of the above circumstances, he submitted them to the Jeonju District Court Branch on January 10, 2017, which was 59, Namwon-ro.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with F, uses the seal of the above corporate representative director's seal in collusion with F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness F;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of the public prosecutor with regard to F (excluding the G statement);

1. Defendants, F, and G (J.)

arrow