1. The defendant received on October 4, 2002 from Nonparty C the Seogu District Court Branch of Seogu District Court on real estate stated in the attached list.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3.

On February 27, 2003, the Plaintiff filed a suit against Nonparty C with the Daegu District Court 2002Kadan123518, and sentenced C to pay the Plaintiff KRW 50 million and its delay damages. The above judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

B. On October 4, 2002, C completed the registration of establishment of a neighboring establishment (hereinafter “registration of establishment of a neighboring establishment”) of the Daegu District Court No. 90397 on the ground that the contract was concluded on October 2, 2002 with respect to the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the instant real estate”) on October 4, 200.

C. C is in the absence of any other capacity as of the date of the closing of the instant argument.

2. Determination

가. 주장 ⑴ 원고의 주장 취지 ㈎ 이 사건 근저당권설정등기는 채무자인 C와 피고 사이에 아무런 피담보채권 없이 통정허위의 표시에 의하여 경료된 원인무효의 등기이다.

㈏ 설령 그 피담보채권이 존재한다

Even if the secured claim of the instant right to collateral security has expired on October 4, 2012 after the lapse of ten years from October 4, 2002, which was the date of creation.

㈐ 그러므로 원고는 C에 대한 위 채권을 보전하기 위하여 C를 대위하여 이 사건 근저당권설정등기의 말소를 구한다.

⑴ 피고의 주장 취지 ㈎ 피고는 C에게 2001. 3. 15. 2,000만 원, 2001. 9. 6. 6,000만 원, 2002. 1. 10. 1,000만 원, 2002. 1. 25. 3,000만 원 등 합계 1억 2,000만 원의 돈을 대여하였고 그 대여금 채권을 담보하기 위하여 이 사건 근저당권설정등기를 경료받은 것으로서, 이 사건 근저당권의 피담보채권은 진정하게 성립하였다.

㈏ 그리고 C로부터 2001. 3. 15.자 2,000만 원에 관하여는 2011. 2. 15.에, 2001. 9. 6...