1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company with the objective of steel materials and building materials leasing business. The Defendant is the original employee of B, and the Defendant was awarded a subcontract for the construction work at the manufacturing site of the cooperation construction company B (hereinafter “cooperative construction”) and was registered as an employee of the cooperation construction company from May 2, 2012 to October 31, 2013 and was in the position of the president of the cooperative construction company, and D is a person who actually operated the E (hereinafter “E”).

B. On November 23, 2012, D visited the Defendant with Samsung (one person G), who was an employee of the Plaintiff, and requested the Plaintiff to affix his/her seal impression on the steel re-lease agreement in which Samsung C was used for the soil works and soil-saving works of the International Redevelopment Association in which Samsung C was ordered and the cooperation construction was subcontracted, and the Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff to affix his/her seal on the steel re-lease agreement in which Samsung C was signed by the lessor, the subcontractor, and E as a joint guarantor (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

The defendant, who had been kept in C at C, affixed a seal impression with the plaintiff on the instant lease contract, etc., and issued D the date of preparation, the date of preparation, the other party's official seal impression, the certificate of personal seal impression, and the business registration certificate. F and D affixed their respective seal impressions with the plaintiff on the instant lease contract, etc.

C. Since then, the Plaintiff leased lecture materials to D or E. D.

The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit, primarily on the grounds that the Plaintiff filed a claim for the payment of the unpaid rental fees, damages, and damages for delay under the instant lease agreement, and the amount equivalent to the amount equivalent to the employer’s liability.

However, on November 5, 2015, the Plaintiff did not have legitimate authority to seal the Defendant’s seal of the cooperative construction employee on the instant lease agreement, and the expression agency is not established. The Plaintiff’s employee’s act of preparing the instant lease agreement is legitimate.