logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.07.23 2015고단1271
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around January 2013, the Defendant stated that “In D Company offices operated by the Defendant in Busan Dong-gu C and 601, the Defendant supplied oil to a large excursion ship, which is necessary to be supplied to the victim E. In addition, the Defendant stated that “A small and medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium-sized

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the right to supply oil to the floating line and did not intend to purchase the floating line even if he received money from the victim.

On January 7, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 20 million from the victim to the passbook in the name of Dong F under the name of Dong F, as the down payment of an excursion ship. On January 10, 2013, the Defendant was transferred KRW 50 million in total to the passbook in F around January 10, 2013.

2. On January 17, 2013, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant shall purchase oil necessary to supply oil to a large excursion ship” with phone calls from the victim at an irregular place.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the right to supply oil to the floating line, and the defendant was thought to pay the personal debt even if he received the money from the victim and to be used as operating expenses of the DNA and G companies operated by the defendant.

Around January 17, 2013, the Defendant received from the victim KRW 40 million as the fund for purchasing oil of the oil of the tank through F before I located in H in Busan District, Busan District.

3. On January 18, 2013, the Defendant told the victim that “the victim need to pay the remainder of the excursion ship and the repair cost.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have purchased an excursion ship at the time, and even if the defendant bears a debt equivalent to KRW 1.3 billion at the time and receives money from the victim, he/she would pay his/her personal debt and use it as operating expenses of the D and G companies operated by the defendant.

The defendant belongs to this.

arrow