A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 27, 2016, at the front of the C Hospital located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 05:35, the Defendant assaulted the victim D (19 years of age) on his/her hand floor on the ground that he/she is bad for the victim to have his/her right, on the ground that he/she was in dispute with the taxi engineer, on two occasions, and used the victim’s right side part of the victim’s right side, on two occasions, and on one occasion at one occasion, the victim’s right side part of the victim’s E (16 years of age). The Defendant assaulted the victim E (16 years of age) with his/her private part of the victim E (16 years of age) who is a driving of the said D.

2. In the course of the patrol, the Defendant arrested the victim G, a police officer affiliated with the police box of Yongsan Police Station F in receipt of a report related to the assault at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article as a current offender of the crime of assault, and the Defendant sexually insultingd the victim by publicly insulting the victim “as the victim complies with the foregoing D, E, and just, frier, bitch, chin, franch, franch, franch, franch, franch, franch, franched, franch,” while complying with the aforementioned D, E, and justs.

3. Around November 27, 2016, around 05:35, the Defendant: (a) was arrested in front of the C Hospital located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a flagrant offender in the crime of assault, as described in paragraph (2); (b) was sent to the patrol vehicle; and (c) on November 27, 2016:06:10 on the part of the tabbbbucks of the said G, the front part of the said G and the part of the right buckbucks; and (d) during the investigation into the air, the Defendant was able to take approximately one hour in 1 hours, including “Cpack, rings, fry, fus, fus, fusch, fusch, fusch, fusch, fump, fump, fump, fump, fump, etc., of the G’s bridge, and the following 3-4 vehicles.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made to D or G by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 260 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and the choice of punishment.