Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 6,500,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 8,00,000 won.
Reasons
Criminal facts
Defendant
On January 22, 2010, A was sentenced by the Jeonju District Court for a crime of false entry into public electromagnetic records, etc. and was released on August 13, 2010 and the parole period passed on November 20, 201.
[2013 Highest 1909] On April 20, 2012, Defendant A made a false statement to the staff J of the Switzerland that “If I purchase one dump truck from the loan chain in the amount of KRW 66 million, I would make an ordinary payment for 36 months.”
However, even if Defendant A purchased a vehicle after concluding a loan agreement with the victim A Capital Co., Ltd., he did not have the intent or ability to pay the vehicle loan installments normally due to the absence of property or monthly income at that time.
Defendant
A, as such, by deceiving the J, which is an employee of the victim Aju Capital Co., Ltd., the temporary business suspension body, and by making a written application for f6 million won in the name of the victim Aju Capital Co., Ltd., the written application for f6 million won in the form of a bank loan from the victim Aju Capital Co., Ltd., the victim, in order to pay 66 million won in the form of a bank loan from the victim Aju Capital Co., Ltd. as the loan for the same day, and thereby, he did not pay the installments for the loan, thereby obtaining financial benefits equivalent
[2013Kadan2774] On December 201, 201, Defendant C offered money to Defendant A by purchasing construction machinery, such as a dump truck, in another person’s name, after receiving a loan from a third person; Defendant C offered that “If dump truck, etc. sump truck, etc. sump truck, etc. sump truck will be sold to a person who lends money to him/her, and Defendant A consented thereto.”
Then, around February 2012, Defendant A proposed that Defendant B purchased a dump truck with a dump truck and made money in installments, and Defendant B had a different role.