A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a business owner who manufactures synthetic resin with the trade name “C” from Gyeonglbuk-gun B.

A business owner shall take measures necessary for the prevention of any danger caused by machinery, apparatus, and other equipment and danger caused by electricity, heat, or any other energy when running his/her business.

1. In order to prevent danger by electricity, the owner of the death by occupational negligence, and the owner of the death by occupational negligence, shall contact the exterior of metal of electrical machinery and apparatus, metal outing, and steel parts in order to prevent the danger of electric shock. Although the site voltage exceeds 150 volts, the owner has a duty of care to install a electric shock circuit for the purpose of preventing electric shock, which is suitable for the rated of mobile or portable electric machinery and apparatus, with a view to operating in good and reliable manner, at around July 16:28, 2013, the Defendant, at the above C around July 16:28, 2013, did not contact the outer part of the site voltage of the printing machine at 380 V, and did not install a electric shock circuit for the said printing machine at that place, by negligence, had D workers who had been working in plastic type of plastic type of equipment printed at that place.

Accordingly, the Defendant caused the death of the foregoing D due to the failure to take such safety measures as above and the failure to perform such safety measures due to occupational negligence at the F Hospital located in the Gyeong-si, North America at around 17:35 of the same day.

2. The business owner who fails to take measures for the prevention of danger by the machinery or other equipment must install a studio, slick, flick, slick, slick, and slick, etc. on the parts where workers are likely to face danger, but the Defendant did not install three power transmission bells with three power transmission bells where workers are likely to face danger.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning G, H, I, J, K, L, and H;

1.Each.