beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' primary claim and conjunctive claim against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
Reasons
Basic Facts
Defendant D and his children shared the buildings listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) (the details of shares are Defendant D3/4, Defendant E1/4), and the instant commercial building were divided into the front part and the rear part.
Plaintiff
A and Plaintiff B, their wife, sought explanation on the current status of the lease of the instant commercial building from Defendant C, the husband of Defendant D, and purchased the instant commercial building for KRW 400 million on June 8, 2009, succeeded to the status of the instant commercial building under the following lease agreement between Defendant D and E, but entered into a sales contract with the effect that the total amount of KRW 30 million is deducted from the purchase deposit (hereinafter “instant sales contract”), and received a lease contract thereafter.
The Plaintiffs, upon entering into a recontract with F 20 million won for the remainder of the monthly rent for the lease deposit of a lessee, shall pay the sum of KRW 30 million for the total of KRW 10 million in G 10,000 for the ten-month period of KRW 70,000 in the part G 10,000 for the remainder of the monthly rent for the lease of a lessee, KRW 2.5 million for the total of KRW 30,000,000 on the date of the instant sales contract, KRW 30,000 for the intermediate payment on June 25, 2009, KRW 110,000 for the intermediate payment on June 10, 2009, KRW 370,000 won for the remainder of KRW 230,000,000 for the remainder on July 10, 209.
(The details of shares are: (a) facts without dispute; (b) statements Nos. 1 and 2; (c) statements Nos. 3-1 and 2; and (d) statements Nos. 1 and 3-2; and the plaintiffs' claims for the purport of the entire pleadings; (b) the actual monthly rent of the instant commercial building was KRW 1.7 million (the front part of KRW 1.3 million and the front part of KRW 400,000), while the defendants have stated the sum of monthly rent in the instant sales contract as KRW 2.5 million; and (c) false lease contract written in return for increased compensation for rent, etc. (F16 million and KRW G3 million).
Therefore, the sales contract of this case constitutes a legal act by fraud or mistake, and is served with a duplicate of the complaint of this case.