beta
Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is the reporter working in D.
On August 30, 2013, between 16:00-16:30 on August 30, 2013 and 16:30, the Defendant: “F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-
2. In conclusion, the above facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act.
However, according to the records, the victims can recognize the fact that they have withdrawn their wish to punish the defendant on October 31, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted.
Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.