A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Force】 On November 1, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on November 1, 2016, and was provisionally released on October 27, 2017 and the parole period expired on January 4, 2018.

【Criminal Fact-finding at around 17:30 on November 11, 2018, the Defendant was driving a B ASEAN A6 car, driving the front road from the location of the D Center in the right-on to the sex-on distance, and driving the F E-V vehicle of the victim E-V (27 years old) driving in the same direction, driving in the same direction, changing the course rapidly to the Defendant’s future, and driving the F-V vehicle of the victim E-V vehicle driving in the same direction, driving in the middle of the same direction, making the border one time, immediately moving back from the sex-on distance to the second way along the above E-V vehicle driving in the middle of the two lanes, following the above E-V vehicle driving in the middle of the three-lane to the two-lane way, and facing the above E-V vehicle immediately facing the Defendant vehicle with the rear wheels of the driver’s seat in the front part of the Defendant’s seat.

As a result, the Defendant carried a dangerous article A6 vehicle, and inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as salt pans, tensions, etc., which requires treatment for about two weeks, and on G (V, 26 years of age) who are the winners of the damaged vehicle, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury, such as salt pans, tensions, etc., for about two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Photographs of the accident site;

1. Previous Records: Criminal history records, investigation report (including the judgment attached to the judgment and the personal confinement status), the defendant and his defense counsel; ① there was only the defendant's thought to give warning to the victims who have driven his vehicle in an unreasonable manner in the same manner in the future, and there was no intention to inflict injury due to shock of actual damaged vehicles; ② the injury suffered by the victims does not interfere with daily life.