beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
All applications for compensation order of this case shall be dismissed.
Of the facts charged in the instant case.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who has worked in E, a credit business brokerage company.
1. The facts of fraud against the victim F were that the victim F (n. 34 years of age) was the guarantor at the time when G was loaned 20 million won from the lending company, and the victim was apprehended to suffer difficulties in getting the loan from the Agricultural Cooperative due to the fact that G became the guarantor, due to the above fact that the victim was the guarantor, and the victim was unlikely to suffer difficulties in getting the loan from the Agricultural Cooperative. In the Agricultural Cooperatives’s computer system, even though the guarantor did not appear in the record, the deletion of the record is able to decide on a new loan, and it was thought that the guarantor’s record could not be used for the personal purpose by inducing the borrower to transfer the loan as the repayment amount of the existing principal, while making it possible to delete the computer registered as the guarantor.
On November 2013, the Defendant sent a phone to the victim in Jinia and the office located in Gyeonggi-gu E Office in Gwangju Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Gwangju, and made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would not interfere with the Defendant’s receipt of a loan by taking a loan from Y in the computer system. In order to delete the computer, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would not interfere with the Defendant’s receipt of a loan by taking a loan from Y-gu, Jinia and the office of Gyeonggi-gu, and thereby obtaining a loan from Y. In order to delete the computer system, the Defendant would make a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant would not have any problem in obtaining a loan in the future because the record of the loan would not remain.”
As above, the Defendant deceptioned the above victim and allowed the said victim to obtain a loan from four lending businesses, such as well-dyingd, etc. designated by the Defendant, and then paid 14.5 million won around November 7, 2013, and five million won in total, around November 15, 2013, for the deletion of computerized registration of the guarantor.