A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:20 on January 9, 2013, the Defendant, without authority, entered the name and resident registration number (H) of G that he knows in lieu of the Defendant’s personal information, and “G” in the column for the confirmation of the arrest of flagrant offenders, and forged another’s signature in front of it, and submitted it to a slope belonging to the said police station, who is aware of the forged fact, a false signature was duly formed, as seen above, as the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender upon being arrested as a flagrant offender with respect to the case of assaulting E going to the front door of the F1:10 on the same day at the C District Office of the Cheongju Police Station located in the Cheongju-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, 01.10 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A certificate of confirmation (name omitted);

1. Audit and inspection of the details thereof, and photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the Investigation Report (General) dated January 9, 2013

1. Article 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The crime of this case committed by the Defendant with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is an unfavorable circumstance such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, family relation, criminal history, and consequence, the following circumstances are considered: (a) the Defendant, who was arrested as a flagrant offender of a assault case, entered another person’s name in a written confirmation in order to conceal the occurrence of a fine due to default; and (b) the Defendant’s depth and reflects the nature of the crime as a matter of course when all the instant crimes were committed; and (c) the Defendant has no same criminal history; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, family relation, criminal history, and consequence

(b) for more than one year.