logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.04 2016가단5301250
양수금
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part claiming the amount of money Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5 in the [Attachment Table] No. 1, 3, 4, and 5 in the annexed list

Reasons

1. In full view of the Plaintiff’s assertion and each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 10 (including the serial number), the part rejecting the claim (the part claiming the amount Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5 in the list of claims that cause the claim) can be seen as a final and conclusive judgment in favor of each of the above claims, and it is difficult to deem otherwise that there is a benefit of lawsuit due to the lapse of the extinctive prescription period. Accordingly, each of the above claims is unlawful because there is no benefit of protection

2. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, the part cited (as stated in the attached Form Nos. 2, 3, 8, and 10-2) as to the claim amount, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the unpaid principal and interest and delay damages as stated in the attached Form No. 2.

arrow