1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the case, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, if the court excludes the part to be used as described in the following paragraph (2). Therefore, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. Parts to be dried;

A. Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, Part 8, “J” in Part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the part 4, 8, and 9, “L” (hereinafter referred to as “L”) shall be incorporated into “L” (hereinafter referred to as “L”) with “L”.

B. Part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance, part 20 to 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be reversed as follows.

On September 1, 2017, the date of payment agreement, 1: F 20,00,000 won (F 20,000,000) on October 26, 2017, G 20,332,620 won on October 26, 2017; 30,80,000 won (H 19,80,000,000 won) on October 27, 2017; and the Plaintiff directly made an agreement between the Defendant and the Plaintiff on the construction work price under the said Table on August 27, 2017 (F 14,90,000,000 won and the Plaintiff, as indicated below, on November 8, 2017; 200,000 won and the Plaintiff directly made an agreement on the construction price under the said Table on August 18, 2018, 206, 307.

C. The first instance judgment of the court of first instance, from Nos. 9 to No. 9, 20 shall be followed as follows.

(C) Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 14, 66, 102, 108, 109, and 110, the plaintiff entered into a direct payment agreement with the defendant and L on August 7, 2017 that "the defendant, L, as the defendant, and L, as the result of completing the singing construction until August 17, 2017, the plaintiff obtained approval from the plaintiff, and the plaintiff completed and approved the singing construction on August 17, 2017, and paid 167,000,000 won directly to L under the defendant's approval within seven days after the approval for use of the building."