beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, each of the defendants B, C, and the defendants D shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
Seized No. 2.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants expressed that the business with a large amount of money is carried on, color the female who is the subject of the crime by using the virtual name and the largephone, induce the female to a scambling place, take the money by deceiving the money as if the scam interest is given by borrowing the gambling money, and take the money by deceiving the money as if the scambling interest is given, and the money obtained by deception was divided by approximately 80% by the female, and approximately 6-8% by the other defendants who play the winding role in the next scam.
Accordingly, on March 2018, Defendant A accessed the victim E who operated a tea in Daegu-gu F, Seo-gu, and introduced Defendant A as “G” by accessing the victim E, who retired from 2 military headquarters investment, and retired from Cheongdo for six years prior to Na, and currently supplies food materials to 2 military headquarters from Daegu.
It shall be transferred to the ruling party at the time of the closing of the military payment.
“A false statement” was made.
Defendant
A on March 28, 2018, the victim “A” shall do so to the victim.
D. A. B. L. L. L. B. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. and L. L. L. L. L. L. and L. L. L. L. L. money, and paid money on the following day.
Defendant B, C, and D have the victim prepare cash of KRW 20 million with the purport that it would bring about a large number of cash, and Defendant A would have the victim complete full payment of KRW 20,000,000 in cash and interest within 12:00 on the same day at “I” restaurant located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, as well as KRW 12:0 on the same day, and followed the victim and let the victim borrow KRW 20,000 in total over several occasions to Defendant A. After Defendant A lost all of the above money to Defendant B, C, and D, Defendant B, C, and D, and Defendant A would have had the victim complete full payment of KRW 20,000 and interest.
The term "" and the gap of repair has been absent from another field.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to deceive the victim, thereby deceiving 20 million won.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Defendants: