logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.01.15 2015고단3493
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2015, the Defendant was notified of dismissal from the president of the above factory on the ground that he was absent from work in the D laundry plant located in the Republic of Korea (China's nationality), the victim E, the victim F (China's Chinese nationality), and the workplace bonus, while working in the D laund plant located in the Republic of Korea as a foreigner of the Korean War, and the Defendant was absent from work without permission.

1. On August 29, 2015, around 09:40 on August 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) told the victim E at the instant laundry factory that “only one telephone call is to be lent and returned;” and (b) took one ballon 2 Hand phone at the market price from the injured party to take one gallon juth jug jug jug jug jug jug jug jug jug jug jug jug jug jug jug ju, and

2. On August 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 10:00 on August 29, 2015, in the front of the accommodation of the victim F, who is a ward in the Dlaundry factory, and (b) on August 10:0, 2015, the Defendant: (c) 30,000 won in cash and one transportation card shall be removed within the victim’s cell phone (LG4) smartphone (LG4) and one transportation card within the victim’s wall under the supervision of the Blaundry factory, with the knowledge that the victim was unable to work at the factory; and (d) locked the lock, which is the victim’s possession, by walking the correct door so as to cover repair costs; and (d) breaking the lock, which is an incidental to the victim’s accommodation, the victim’s housing, in order to steal the property;

In addition, they stolen them.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property and infringed on the victim's residence, and stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged on-site photographs, dormitories and field photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act (a point of view), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (a point of view of damage to property), and Article 319 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow