1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The head of Sung-dong Tax Office imposed a disposition of imposition of global income tax of KRW 1,641,820, global income tax of July 1, 2009, global income tax of KRW 2,698,650, global income tax of KRW 2,573,400, global income tax of KRW 2,573,400, global income tax of KRW 2,565,000, global income tax of KRW 2,565,00, which reverts on July 201 (hereinafter “instant disposition of imposition of global income tax”) on the ground that the Plaintiff engaged in the sales business on consignment from July 1, 2009 to June 21, 201 (hereinafter “instant business”).

B. The head of Seongdong-gu Tax Office notified the Defendant of the details of the imposition of global income tax of this case by ordinary mail. Based on this, the Defendant again issued a notice of the imposition of local income tax of KRW 256,50 on April 13, 2010 to the Seoul Seongdong-gu Tax Office as the place of service of KRW 164,180, Nov. 16, 2010, KRW 269,860, KRW 257,340 on June 10, 201, KRW 257,340 on June 10, 201, KRW 256,50 on January 10, 2012, but did not pay the said tax, KRW 256,50 on March 13, 2014, KRW 186,00 on July 186, 200, KRW 300 on the local income tax reverted to the Plaintiff on June 16, 2015.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant payment notice”) C.

On June 9, 2014, the Plaintiff appealed to the instant disposition and filed the instant lawsuit.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 3, the purport of whole pleadings]

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the project of this case is not run by the plaintiff, but actually operated by the non-party D by stealing the name of the plaintiff.

Therefore, the instant disposition is rendered.